I read romance novels obsessively for more than 20 years. I’m not entirely sure why, but I suddenly lost interest. A few days ago I was in a grocery store and saw the new Eloisa James, and thought, “hey, I liked her. Let’s try another one.”
This review is not appropriate for children or people with delicate sensibilities.Once Upon a Tower is about sex – how bad sex can tank a marriage and great sex can save it. The main characters are Gowan, Duke of Kinross, a ridiculously wealthy Scottish lord (because of course) and Lady Edith Gilchrist, a sheltered, cello playing, English lady making her debut. They meet at her debut ball, where she is so ill all she can do is smile and look pretty. Naturally, he falls madly in love with her and asks to marry her the next day. Still feverish, she agrees. Classic romance trope – strangers who must get to know each other after being engaged or married. There’s an exchange of letters, they develop a mutual passion and are married shortly after their engagement.
And then things begin to go horribly wrong. They are both virgins. But he is well endowed, and she finds penetration painful. She’s ok with that happening the first time, but sex remains painful for her after that as well. The pain diminishes her enthusiasm for sex. Young Gowan may be inexperienced, but he apparently grew up with a library of smutty books. Gowan expects to be able to bring Edie pleasure in bed and equates her pleasure with his manhood. He doesn’t want to stop thrusting until Edie orgasms. Edie, knowing this and not wanting him to feel bad, while also not wanting to continue feeling bad herself, fakes orgasms. Their sex problems lead to other problems.
There is a lot of drama. Things are said. People storm off. Other people get involved. On the verge of loosing her forever, Gowan makes a last ditch effort. They finally connect honestly and then have amazing sex. Everything is perfect. Ahh! The magical power of sex.
And then we get to the happily ever after. I think this is where my impatience with romance novels began. I know people don’t read romance novels for the realism, but some of these happily ever afters are just fatuous. “Are you kidding me!!” ran through my mind at least three times during the final chapter. I won’t spoil the ridiculousness for you. It’s all predictable and improbable.
Here are a couple of things I appreciated about this book. There was no external villain. The story was entirely about people getting to know each other, self-acceptance, communication and trust.
I won’t say it was a bad book. It wasn’t. Eloisa James is still one of the better romance writers. I don’t think I’ll ever be a regular romance reader again, not because there is anything wrong with the genre, or because I “grew” out of it. I changed. I still read genre books with ridiculous amounts of drama, tropes, etc. I just read a different genre now.
TWENTY years?! I would love some recommendations! I’ve been reading romance for a year and just gave paranormals a shot. It…did not go well.
I may have to come back an answer this question a few times. My initial thoughts are – Jayne Ann Krentz Late 1980s – late 1990s. Before that her males were stupidly alpha, after that she got really into the woo woo. Pre–Bridgerton Julia Quinn. Carla Kelly. Early to mid Mary Balogh. I always liked Lisa Kleypas’ historicals – her modern day romances often make me crazy. Nora Roberts has fairly predictable formulas, so I get tired of her quickly. Mary Jo Putney, though she has a lot of psychological drama. I got rid of my library, so there are probably a lot I’m forgetting.
I’ve read a bunch of Balogh (the Slightly and Simply series) and I think Slightly Dangerous is a classic. I keep waiting for A Summer to Remember to be reasonably priced on Amazon since my library doesn’t have it.
Lisa Kleypas is my m-effing queen!
Slightly Dangerous was my favorite of that series. Try Heartless http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/110299.Heartless
It has a very different hero.
I like romance for the fantasy element – which is probably why I only dig historicals or some urban romance novels and have -zero- interest in anything remotely modern. Somehow a couple having bad sex, communication issues, etc. seems to go against the fun fantasy. Duels at dawn, lavish parties, and possibly a pirate adventure are more my thing 😉
There’s something rather fantastical about this particular sex problem – he’s too interested in her pleasure. What a terrible problem to have.
It is possible for a guy to be considerate.
That was supposed to be *too* considerate. Oy.
I figured that’s what you meant. Still, once they get the technique and communication down the implication is that they have fabulous sex for the rest of their lives. Which is the fantasy of course.
I thought historical romance was fantastical on that front until I read some paranormal romance by Kresley Cole. It was so ridiculous and insanely over the top (and uncomfortably bite-laden) that I invented a term for it in my review.